House Republicans Mark Up and Pass Farm Bill Through Agriculture Committee.
After hours of debate over nutrition, conservation, the definition of "cuts," and the meaning of "bipartisanship," the Committee voted 33-21 (GOP + 4 Democrats) to move their bill to the House floor.
The House Agriculture Committee met yesterday to officially “mark up” Chair Glenn Thompson’s (R-PA) draft “Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2024” (HR 8467). The Republican draft was passed with few changes, as Republicans were able to hold their caucus together and fend of numerous amendments offered by Democrats. A conference report detailing the changes made during the Committee’s business meeting is expected soon.
Contentious debate focused on the following Democratic amendments, with all failing on party line votes:
Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) Reform. Republicans successfully voted down an amendment to restore current CCC authority to the Secretary of Agriculture. The House draft imposes limits on CCC spending, and is one of House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson’s key proposed budget cuts required to pay for increased farm subsidy spending.
Climate Sideboards on Conservation Programs. Democrats were unable to convince Republicans to maintain current “climate smart” sideboards on U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conservation programs. The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) increased conservation budgets for certain agricultural practices that reduce climate pollution. The House Republican draft removes the climate smart requirement and moves IRA funding into the broader Farm Bill Conservation Title.
Cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The House Republican draft maintained its approximately $27 billion cut to SNAP, the other major Thompson budget cut proposal. Democrats fought hard to retain current SNAP rules and budgets, but were unable to convince any Republicans to join them. Many Republicans attempted to deny that their bill included SNAP cuts, though the Congressional Budget Office stands by their $27 billion estimate for proposed Republican cuts.
Child Labor in Meatpacking Plants. Democrats proposed an amendment that would require meatpacking plants under contract with USDA to follow child labor laws. The tense debate ended with a Thompson commitment to call a hearing on the issue with the Secretaries of Agriculture and Labor in attendance.
Many other amendment battles are brewing in the Senate and on the House floor. Restrictions on hemp products, for example, looks to be a major battleground. The Senate is likely to propose strengthening the Packers and Stockyards Act, and could face an amendment on checkoff reform. It is possible for Democrats to offer an amendment that protects state and local government authority to enact environmental standards more strict than federal rules.
Thompson does not expect the Committee draft to move to the House floor until September, according to reporting from The Hagstrom Report. In the meantime, Senate Democrats are expected to release and mark-up their draft Farm Bill.
Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) responded to the House Mark-up in a statement: “Despite areas of common ground, it is now clear that key parts of the House bill split the Farm Bill coalition in a way that makes it impossible to achieve the votes to become law. And it is also clear that we do not have time to waste on proposals that cannot meet that goal.”
Many Farm Bill negotiators worked hard to present themselves as “bipartisan,” though there was little evidence of bipartisanship or compromise during the amendment process.
“I encourage my colleagues to work together to make this bill the best it can be. I have heard a lot today about the ‘bipartisan’ efforts to do that” said Rep. Johanna Hayes (D-CT) during the meeting. “I cannot tell you personally I’ve seen that, but I am open to that happening.”
The mark-up began under cordial terms, but things got contentious after the first few speakers. Rep. Austin Scott (R-GA) was the first to break through the bipartisan tone, describing “misinformation coming from activists outside—and inside” that is hampering the Farm Bill re-negotiation process.
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) then delivered one of the Democrats’ most pointed critiques of the Republican draft:
“This bill is a disaster. It’s a disaster for America’s farmers. It’s a disaster for America’s families. It’s a disaster for America’s environment. And it’s a disaster for America’s workers.
You know who this bill is a big win for? It’s a win for CEOs in c-suites that have never worked in a field for a day in their lives. It’s a win for people with luxury beachfront properties and fancy high-rise apartments who make their money screwing over our family farmers.
That’s who benefits most from this bill. The rich. And the powerful. And it’s a damn shame.”
McGovern went further, criticizing Republican farm policy over the last 50 years:
“Let’s talk about just how bad this bill is. We’ve been losing family farms in this country since the Nixon Administration told farmers ‘get big or get out.’ If this Farm Bill were to become law, things would get a hell of a lot worse.
Republicans want to starve out family farms. They’re funneling resources to those at the top while taking support away for independent farmers.”
Democrats were able to hold their caucus together for amendment process, but four Democratic members joined the Republicans in the final draft vote. Reps. Sanford Bishop (D-GA), Yadira Caraveo (D-CO), Erik Sorensen (D-IL), and Don Davis (D-NC) all voted to advance the marked-up Committee Report to the House floor.
The Cocklebur covers rural policy and politics from a progressive point-of-view. Our work focuses on a tangled rural political reality of dishonest debate, economic and racial disparities, corporate power over our democracy, and disinformation peddled by conservative media outlets. We aim to use facts, data, and science to inform our point-of-view. We wear our complicated love/WTF relationship with rural America on our sleeve.